Sunday, March 5, 2017

Israel Museum Tiyul

Last Wednesday we went to the Israel Museum to learn about Roman Period, which began in 63 BCE. During the later period of the Hasmonean (Maccabean) Dynasty, two brothers struggled for control of the throne. The weaker brother, Hyrcanus II, actually allied himself with Rome and invited the Romans into Israel to strengthen his legitimacy. However, this led to the Romans taking control of Israel. From 63-6 BCE, the Romans appointed puppet kings in Israel, who had the appearance of sovereignty but actually just did the Romans’ bidding.
The Romans did bring new technology, architecture, and infrastructure to Jerusalem, such as arches, aqueducts, roads, and a grid city system. However, they instated harsh taxes and put up their own statues in the Beit Hamikdash. The Romans still let the Jews go to the Temple, but they built a fortress right outside, so they had an eye on everything that went on.
We got to see an extraordinary model of Jerusalem during the Roman period, featuring the Beit Hamikdash, the Roman fortress, and all the houses of the people who lived in Jerusalem. In the model of the Beit Hamikdash, we saw the huge staircases that the Jews would climb up to enter the Beit Hamikdash to celebrate the three pilgrimage holidays: Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot. We could also see the outside of the Holy of Holies, the area where only the Cohen Hagadol, the high priest, could go in once a year. Throughout the model, we were able to see the divisions between the different Jewish sects based on the different types of house. The richer Jews had plenty of space between their homes, with fountains and courtyards, while the poorer Jews lived in smaller houses all cramped on top of each other. We learned that there were actually four different Jewish sects: the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Essenes, and the Zealots (aka the Sikarim). These different sects developed because (of course, typical Jews) people disagreed on how to practice Judaism and how to live as Jews in the Roman-controlled city.  
The Pharisees were the rabbis, who believed the Temple was unnecessary and Torah was the most important aspect of Jewish life. They worshipped in synagogues, interpreted the Torah, and most notably, believed in the importance of oral law (Torah she’bal peh). The Pharisees believed that God gave us instructions orally at Mt. Sinai, and those laws were just as important as the laws written in the Torah. The Pharisees were the lower class citizens, and lived in worse conditions in Jerusalem. The Pharisees’ Judaism is what we practice today, as we can’t make sacrifices at the Temple and instead worship in synagogues. Finally, the Pharisees didn’t really like living under Roman rule.
The Sadducees were the wealthy upper class, who were involved with the priesthood. They completely rejected oral law, and instead their lives revolved around the Temple. The Sadducees' job was to make sacrifices and maintain the Temple’s purity. Although the Sadducees were the most involved with the Temple, they were also the most Hellenized Jews, and respected Greco-Roman civilization and rule.
The Pharisees and Sadducees made up the Sanhedrin, a council of seventy men who made all the decisions for the Jews. The tie-breaker was the high priest, who was called the nasee. In modern Hebrew, nasee means president.
The third sect, the Essenes, actually left Jerusalem to live in a kibbutz-like compound in Qumran (near the Dead Sea). Their secluded desert community was dedicated to prayer and study in preparation for the return of the Messiah. They were obsessed with purifying themselves for the Messiah, and constantly went in the mikvah, the Jewish ritual bath.
We got to see the Dead Sea Scrolls which were used by the Essenes. The Dead Sea Scrolls were found in Qumran and are the oldest copies of the Tanakh ever discovered. It was so cool to see how far back our traditions go, and be able to pick out the familiar letters on the scrolls.
Finally, the Sikarim were zealots who completely opposed Roman rule. The Sikarim were ready to kill all the Romans and any Jews who didn’t help them overthrow the Romans. The word “sikarim” actually means “little dagger” for the daggers that they would use to kill people.
Personally, I most identify with the Pharisees. I like that they didn’t rely on the Temple to structure their Jewish practice and I feel the most connected to them because their practice most closely resembles the Judaism I practice today. I like that they used the Torah to built their own interpretations for Judaism. I also identify with the Sikarim. Although I one hundred percent don’t believe in the violence that the Sikarim supported, I can understand their feelings of frustration at living in a political climate they didn't agree with and their desire to change it.
So what do you think? Do you identify with one sect, or multiple sects? If you lived in this time, how would you have survived under Roman rule?


Model of Jerusalem: we can see the Beit Hamikdash and the fortress right outside.

We can see all the Pharisees' small houses all crowded together. 
Kitat Dov has lots of ahava for our tiyulim :)




13 comments:

  1. I identify most with the Zealots because I think it is inspiring how far they went to preserve their beliefs and religion. They where willing to both die and kill for their beliefs. I wish I had something I was so passionate about(maybe not to those extremes, however). I don't think I would have followed the Zealots in their time, though. I most likely would have remained inconspicuous and kept to myself to survive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel that I identify with different aspects of the various sects. For example, one thing I admire about the pharisees is their ability to dedicate their time to what they care about, the Torah, without worrying about their economic standing. They are poor, but they get by, while studying and immersing themselves in what they value most in life. What also stood out to me was the determination of the Zealots. While they were quite violent in the defending of their values in relation to the Romans, it is interesting how willing they were to risk it all for what they believed would be beneficial for their people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Personally I identify mostly with the Saducees and the Pherisees. I would like to identify myself with the pharisees because I am studious just like the rabbis. However, unlike them I would not want to live in small, tiny huts. In that way, I would mostly identify myself with the Saducees. I would not have followed the zealots because I do not like to kill people and I would not be the Essenes because I don't like the desert and I don't believe in the Masiah. Honestly, if I was living in that time period I do not think that I would have survived Roman Rule.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that my view of Judaism doesn't really match up with any of the sects, but if I had to choose one it would be the Pharisees. I think that my views of Jewish values and the Torah are most similar to this particular sect. However, I think that the Judaism we practice today is so much more different to the Judaism of this time period. I'm honestly not sure how I would have survived under Roman rule, especially if that meant assimilating to the Roman culture and giving up my Jewish identity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I personally identify with, or at least have the most respect for the sadducees. I think that the concept of priesthood is just so fascinating. I understand how now rabbis are teachers and anyone can become a rabbi if they work at it. but it seems very interesting to have just one sect controlling the religion and running it, at times being mysterious if they must. It's a lost practice. The only thing more modern I can compare it to is how the pope almost mirror the Kohen Hagadol.
    In terms of surviving during this time I personally think I would have conformed to roman rule and assimilated. For me right now I identify as American more than I do as a Jew. I have a lot of pride in my country and those in charge (for the most part). If I was the same person back then as I am now I would have no problem leaving Judaism and allowing for the Ronan's to find favor in me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ultimately, I would place myself in both the sect of the Pharisees or the Essenes. The judaism the Pharisees most clearly resembles the Judaism I observe today and for that reason I would identify myself with that subgroup. However, I would also identify with the Essenes because these Jews could not handle the rule of the Romans in Jerusalem and so they took their set of beliefs and migrated some where else. I resonate with this action because they did not take the initiative to go to war, they simply got up and left. If I were a Jew at this time, I think I would probably haven taken this initiative that the Essenes did. I do not think I would have liked to be under Roman rule and as a result, I would have moved to the dead sea area.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Personally, I don't see myself fitting in with any one of the sects but rather a combination of a few. I believe in the morals of the pharisees and I admire their passion for not interpreting the torah in one template way. I also relate with some of the essenes' actions, as rather than stand by idle and wait, they respected themselves enough and held enough self-confidence to move to an isolated location and continue their beliefs. Although I don't agree with murder, I respect the Zealots drive and their determination to fight for what they believed in.
    I'm not sure which actions I would take as a Jew at the time, as I suppose it would depend on how I identified myself as a jewish person. If my Judaism heavily relied on a need to say the prayers or practice torah I would likely identify with one of the groups I mentioned. Contrastingly, if I felt I connected more with a community aspect of jewishness and was willing to give this up in order for survival, I would probably lean towards the Saducees, (although I understand their passion of the torah as well) or assimilate into Roman rule when the time came.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think I identify as a mix of the Pharisees and Zealots. Because I am passionate about Judaism, if someone where to challenge my beliefs or try to make me conform to another religion forcefully, I would have the same amount of drive as the zealots just without the violence. I also respect how much the Pharisees challenge the torah and strive to interpret it. I am always questioning what I read, constantly want to learn more and love to teach it to other people. Therefor I feel connect deeply with them.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I personally find myself identifying the most with the Pharisees or Eseens. The Pharisees were extremely passionate about judaism, and were still practicing the religeon, even when the rest of Israel was falling apart. They were able to stay true to themselves and keep the religeon aliv. I identidy with the Essenes because they were able to be the bigger person, and peacfully leave the land, going somewhere else, and continuing the practice of judaism without any violence.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I find myself most closely identifying with the sadduces and pharisees. I am somewhat religious at home, and the pharisees were the studious, religious rabbis. I also find myself identifying with the sadduces because although I do not completely assimilate to other cultures, I consider myself to be very westernized/modernized and not sticking to the old ways as the other sects often did.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I would find myself most closely identifying with the Sadducees. At home, I always attend Hebrew school and I like participating in studying Torah. Also, I find myself agreeing with the ideas of the zealots. They believe in fighting for their cause and I completely support that. I would definitely be I. Between these two sects if I had lived during this time period.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I don't really identify with any of them. Although its cool how the Pharisees don't need a temple to remain Jewish. During this time I'd probably not survive or just like follow what the Romans want me to and then run away to Sweden or something somehow

    ReplyDelete
  13. Personally, I identified the most with the Pharisees because I look at them as a more modern Jewish society in the way I pray today. For example, the Pharisees did not rely on temple to practice and pray so because of this, I feel the most connected to them as it mimics the way I practice the Judaism culture. Under the Roman rule, I would keep my heritage history but at the same time, I would not die for the Jewish religion. The Jewish religion is important to me but I would not say that I would have died for the Jewish religion.

    ReplyDelete